Showing posts with label _Thinking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label _Thinking. Show all posts

We aren't whiny afterall...

Friday, November 14, 2008

So let's be honest: we ALL know there's a generation gap. Those who text without looking vs. those who fondly remember the rotary phone. You know which camp is yours.

And as a Millennial, I've put up with my fair share of snarky comments from co-workers, family and friends born pre-MTV's '81 launch. Worse yet, I've conceded the whining inherent with my tech-savvy, web-voyeuristic compatriots.

But I'm not taking it any more. Why? (you might ask... especially if you were born post-disco.)

Because I finally have research and The Economist on my side. Frankly if science and Brits are on-board, the rest of the critical, sardonic world should come around.

The Nov. 13th edition of The Economist ran a story profiling author Don Tapscott and singing the praises of the "net generation." Tapscott recently completed a study of 8,000 people in 12 countries born between 1978 and 1994 and has published his findings in a new book "Grown Up Digital."

His research shows a generation that is optimistic, entertaining and convincing. Tapscott argues, "The problem is not the net generation but befuddled baby-boomers, who once sang along with Bob Dylan that 'something is happening here, but you don’t know what it is', yet now find that they are clueless about the revolutionary changes taking place among the young."

Contrary to the claims that Wii, Facebook and the dreaded text message have robbed today’s young of the ability to think, Tapscott believes that “Net Geners” are the “smartest generation ever”. Yup. That's right. The smartest generation ever.

Tapscott identifies eight "norms" that make this generation so smart:

  • We value freedom and choice in everything they do.
  • We love to customize and personalize.
  • We scrutinize everything.
  • We demand integrity and openness, including when deciding what to buy and where to work.
  • We want entertainment and play in work and education, as well as social life.
  • We love to collaborate.
  • We expect everything to happen fast.
  • And we expect constant innovation.

Since innovation is a big part of my daily life, I found the eighth Net Gen norm to be great news, though not surprising. “These empowered young people are beginning to transform every institution of modern life.” With financial crisis and global climate change, I think we all hope this transformation is in the near future.

Now neither Tapscott's research (nor I) make any excuses for the group of Millennial celebrities and everyday idiots out there making indiscrete choices and posting them online. But let's be fair, those choices aren't new. Just more widely communicated.

All-in-all, this article reminds me to be a proud member of the generation who grew up watching TGIF, worshipping Michael Jordan and knowing my friends by their screen names.

If you'd like to read the complete article, check out: http://www.economist.com/books/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12591038.

And thanks Mr. Tapscott, I've already texted all my friends with this fab news.

Hot Ticket in B-School: Bringing Life Values to Corporate Ethics

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Shifting Careers
Hot Ticket in B-School: Bringing Life Values to Corporate Ethics
Ben Sklar for the New York Times

Stewart D. Friedman, a Wharton business professor, took his message to Bazaarvoice, a company started by a former student.
Published: May 29, 2008

STUDENTS talk about Stewart D. Friedman, a management professor at the Wharton School, with a mixture of earnest admiration, gratitude and rock star adoration.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
Ben Sklar for The New York Times

Brett Hurt, the chief of Bazaarvoice, hired his teacher to tell his employees how to lead better and live more richly.

When they join his class, they commit to sharing intimate details with their classmates about their most important relationships, and many of them later credit Mr. Friedman with changing their lives. At least one alumnus has asked Mr. Friedman to train an entire company in his style of leadership and living.

It may not sound like the stuff of business school education. But Mr. Friedman and other like-minded leadership educators have tapped into a desire by both students and established entrepreneurs for more integration of their careers and personal lives.

Mr. Friedman’s philosophy is fairly straightforward. The fundamental premise is that leadership can exist in every person, whether at the top, middle or bottom of any group. Mr. Friedman also teaches that leadership should not be confined to work, but extended to one’s personal life, community involvement and family life.

In his class, Mr. Friedman guides students through exercises to identify their core values and to express ways that they are feeling out of sync with those values. Students then develop experiments intended to create what Mr. Friedman calls “four-way wins,” changes that will have positive effects in all aspects of their lives.

Many business schools have their versions of Mr. Friedman. The professors are generally charismatic figures who form close relationships with their students and create a network of graduates who are encouraged to stay in touch and help one another long after their coursework is completed. They also tend to move between academia and the business world, often offering variations of their programs for academic or corporate use.

Experts in the leadership field say that today’s business climate is especially conducive to a type of leadership informed by strong personal values. Allan R. Cohen, the dean of Babson College’s graduate business school, who has taught leadership for over 30 years, says that while the current language of leadership focuses on authenticity and looking at the whole person, this type of thinking has been around in some form since the 1940s, when human skills were first starting to be addressed in academia. In the 1960s, he said, sensitivity training, like EST (Erhard Seminars Training), was in vogue.

“There was a period when you’d never talk about the emotional or sensitive side of leadership,” Mr. Cohen said. “Then the pendulum swings and you find out that some of these people are tone-deaf and emotion-blind, that they lose their followers and make decisions that aren’t so good. We have seen a lot of unethical leadership, and all of a sudden devoting your career to just making money isn’t looking so attractive. So different kinds of courses become more interesting.”

Srikumar Rao, an adjunct instructor at London Business School, created a similar phenomenon with his popular class, “Creativity and Personal Mastery,” which he developed at Long Island University, then took to Columbia Business School.

Like Mr. Friedman, Mr. Rao published a book, “Are You Ready to Succeed,” based on his course. He has also conducted versions of his programs, at daily rates as high as $25,000, at companies including Saatchi & Saatchi, Chubb and McDonald’s. Several of Mr. Rao’s alumni, referred to as Raoists by some, are gathering this summer in New York for his first alumni retreat.

Mr. Friedman encourages networking by pairing students with alumni coaches who serve as mentors to students going through the course. Harry Weiner, a founding partner of On-Ramps, a recruiting and consulting firm that focuses on flexible work arrangements, took Mr. Friedman’s Wharton class in the spring of 2006 and has acted as an alumni mentor ever since.

“The course had a profound effect on me,” Mr. Weiner said. “As part of the class, you have to create a leadership vision for yourself, and he asks you to write a brief analysis of yourself 15 years from now. That exercise made me realize that what I was doing at the time — recruiting for hedge funds and venture capital firms — was not having any societal impact other than driving up compensation for people who were already grossly overpaid. I wanted to do something that was still financially rewarding, but had more of a positive impact on society.

“In the end, it wasn’t just about how I could do better at work, though it’s very much about business results. It is holistic."

Mr. Friedman, who has taught at Wharton since 1984, has a long history of work and scholarship in the fields of organizational behavior, work and life integration, and leadership. He earned a doctorate from the University of Michigan, and has spent time in the corporate sector. His latest book, “Total Leadership,” which will be published next month by Harvard Business Press, grew out of a program he developed during a two-year assignment at Ford Motor Company and refined in his classes at Wharton.

The course has been taught in Wharton’s regular M.B.A. program, but Mr. Friedman says it is particularly relevant for midcareer students in Wharton’s executive M.B.A. program, who often have families and children, and are feeling the pressures of managing their lives.

“The reason it’s been so well received,” according to Michael Useem, the director of Wharton’s Center for Leadership and Change Management, “is that those in their 30s and 40s have mastered many essentials — finance, accounting, strategic thinking — and they are savvy about how your private life fits and should be reconciled with your work life, as opposed to in conflict with it.”

One alumnus, Brett Hurt, is so dedicated to Mr. Friedman’s philosophy that he invited his former professor to visit his company, Bazaarvoice Inc. in Austin, Tex., to lead a half-day workshop for more than 100 employees. Mr. Hurt bought the book for all employees who attended and is now leading the company in a four-month immersion in the program.

At the workshop, Mr. Friedman assigned people into randomly selected groups of three who will meet periodically and coach one another through the exercises in the book. This moderated book club format shares elements with Oprah Winfrey’s book club, especially the online discussions she led around Eckhart Tolle’s book “A New Earth.”

Mr. Hurt blogged about the book and the training session, writing that he expected a “massive impact” on his company’s culture even though it might mean a near-term decrease in the time employees spend at work while they are going through the exercises. Once the process is completed, Mr. Hurt wrote, he expects productivity and effectiveness to increase.

Tung Hungh, a community manager for Bazaarvoice, described the Total Leadership experiment as reflective of the company’s unique culture.

“Brett, our C.E.O. and founder, is well attuned to the latest theories and methodologies of business and wanted to share this book with our company,” he said. “It started out as a surprise. He asked us to be free on this date, and then Stew Friedman was the surprise visitor.”

Mr. Hurt “believes we can all be better leaders, and after two years at the company, I am now starting to see more of why he believes this,” Mr. Hungh said. “Brett might be the only person more excited about this than me.”

Here's to the Earth...

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Team,

I realize that most of us are out of the office, but it does bring a little tear to my eye to not be in proximity to you all on such a special day, that would no doubt be full of lots of banter back and forth and harassment for me, a better option than remaining in this cubicle where I don’t really have the right to spread green wisdom.

In lieu of doing something as a group, I was inspired by my Outward Bound Quote of the Day:

"The important thing for you is not how much you know, but the quality of what you know."
- Erasmus

And thought that it might be fun to share a list of a few of the sources that I use to gain good knowledge on the environment and all things “sustainable.” Perhaps, to start a chain of eco-inspiration on Earth Day that I would love for anyone else to build upon. You got insight on saving the planet? I am all ears.

Here’s where I go to learn about environmental issues – both fun stuff, practical stuff, and sometimes serious stuff.





















www.sprig.com Created by the Washington Post, this site has great information on eco-friendly products and eco-friendly people – entrepreneurs who are changing the world, and often these are small business people. Go to the website and sign on to the daily newsletter that includes info on one product, one person. It’s a wealth of information for those of us that like to buy nice things (it’s a little pricey) or just look at nice things that we’d like to buy later in life!










www.idealbite.com My libertarian philosophy professor’s wife, who is a yoga instructor, referred me to this website. So rest assured, it’s smart, practical, and the absolute minimal information you need to make fair decisions (both to others and to yourself) (i.e. cheap!) on what to buy, what to read, what to build. It’s a lot less froo-frooey then sprig but for those of us that are wondering, “How can I lessen my impact easily?” it’s great daily newsletter to receive.










www.stopglobalwarming.org Thought I would add this to the list, given our strong interest in celebrity affairs around the office. A website and newsletter from an organization that is environmental activism Hollywood-style. Started by the woman who partnered with Al Gore for An Inconvenient Truth, Laurie David, there are some slight political leanings but it’s really not too drastic (i.e. the grist). Instead, go here to see cute pictures of Leo or George spreading the word. There’s also a Stop Global Warming March that they’ve held online – you go, sign up for the march and then get the monthly newsletter automatically.







www.sierraclub.com If you’re looking for quality of information, here’s where to go. It’s the most established environmental awareness group with great local activism. As a member you get the national quarterly magazine and a local quarterly newsletter. It’s how I learn about things like the huge coal plant that Dominion is trying to build in western Virginia, or the cool things happening on the James. Thought it might be nice for those of us that love the local nature that people don’t take advantage of enough. Anyways, a great reference, should you not want to join ($25.00).


That’s it. Again, just wanted to share some places I use to continue to try to stay informed – hope everyone is having a great day, and again, if you’ve got a newsletter, blog, organization, etc. that you’d like to share – feel free to leave a comment. Wanted everyone to get this information today – wherever we are!

Seriously people.
-Patty

Innovation is alive and well.

Thursday, February 07, 2008



That’s what they’re saying in Florida. While attending IIR’s THE Conference on Marketing www.theconferenceonmarketing.com in Naples earlier this week, I was struck by how many marketers have innovation on the top of their minds, the tip of their tongues, and all over their to-do lists. Speakers from GlaxoSmithKline to Pizza Hut to GE to author Malcolm Gladwell shared their thoughts around that increasingly ubiquitous word: innovation.

As we know, the most interesting part of the innovation conversation occurs when you dive below the word itself and start to explore what innovation really means to people and their organizations. From my conversations, here’s what it boiled down to: ideas and relationships.

Everywhere I turned people were talking about how to infuse new thinking into their organizations. From curiosity about emerging technologies and the future of social networking to insights around Chinese consumers, Prime Time women and Xoomers, marketers were gathering inspiration to spark their next great idea. Several speakers mentioned that the lion’s share of their current revenue comes from products and services that didn’t even exist 5 (or 2!) years ago. Marketers have made peace with the ever-increasing pace of change, and their organizations are seeing new ideas pay off in a big way.

While marketers looked for new ideas, innovation practitioners were talking about the importance of collaboration and they ways they are mining the collective intellectual capital within their organizations. From old favorites like collaborative workspaces, to newer ideas like proprietary web solutions innovators are intent on building an environment where the people side of innovation can thrive. Relationships were top of mind with innovators, who understand that great relationships – the kind that include authenticity, transparency, and debate – enable great thinking.

So, judging by what they say in Florida, innovation is alive and well. And remember—judging from recent political history—what Florida says goes.

What does it take to have a conversation?

Monday, November 19, 2007

In a recent posting by Lewis Green, founder and managing principal of L&G Business Solutions, he posed the question: Is social web conversation over? What he was talking about was the rising presence of blogs that seems to be resulting in the lack of comments on blogs. That those who read blogs aren't contributing back with comments, and therefore, limiting the conversation. His contention: blogs are only as good as the comments resulting from a posting. So as I post on our blog about his blog, am I really limiting the conversation or just starting another?

Now don't get me wrong, I agree with Green's contention. Conversations are critical. And in today's world of free and unregulated information distribution, it's certainly important to comment on blogs and edit wikis to reflect both alternate perspectives and accurate descriptions. However for many organizations, the conversations still need to begin face-to-face in order engage people.

So let's bring this question inside the firewalls-- what makes a good conversation within an organization? How do we take conversations off the intranet, out of the cubicle and into the hallways, conference rooms, cafeterias or atriums? How do we foster face-to-face conversations that aren't just about weekend plans but about changing what we do or how we do it? In truth, today's business leaders should be empowering their teams to have frank, fierce and powerful conversations. How will you engage your associates in good, contentious, difficult, and hopefully business-changing conversations?





































If you'd like to read Green's complete posting, check out: http://www.mpdailyfix.com/2007/11/is_this_the_day_the_conversati.html

Sabbaticals and Other Business Trends -- What are we seeing?

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

As a hook to Patty’s recent DaVinci quote about sabbaticals, I thought I would share a snippet from a story idea about sabbaticals that we have been pitching to select media. The snippet ties the rise in workplace sabbaticals to three trends. What else are we seeing in the marketplace? What corresponding tools and mechanisms can we suggest to the marketplace?

Sabbaticals aren’t just for academics anymore. Approximately 40 percent of large, 21 percent of mid-sized, and 16 percent of small companies offer paid or unpaid sabbaticals, according to a recent study by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). Just six years ago, only 15 percent of all companies offered unpaid sabbaticals.

The movement toward workplace sabbaticals is tied to three major business trends.

  • Innovation is a priority. Running a company used to be about doing. Now, it is as much about thinking – more specifically, thinking of innovative new ideas that move the market and fuel business growth. Two-thirds of senior executives list innovation as one of their top three priorities for 2007; and it takes an inspired and creative mind to deliver innovation in today’s marketplace. Sabbaticals provide inspiration and fuel creativity for leaders who must deliver innovation.
  • Time is the new workplace currency. Benefits managers now say that employees value time off as much or more than dollars. This is true for all generations of employees – from Boomers, who are looking for flexible ways to ease into retirement or extend their earning years – to the sixty-one percent of Gen-Xers who have either taken a sabbatical or express the desire to do so – to Millennials who cite time-off as a pronounced factor in determining acceptance of job offers.
  • Career paths are becoming more flexible. In today’s flexible workplace where people change jobs frequently, there is less stigma around employment gaps and employers see value in personal development that comes from pursuing a passion, supporting a charitable organization, or gaining international experience–even via a backpacking trip through Peru. Taking time off is now part of the mainstream and employers realize that making it easy for employees to explore interests outside of work is a good way to build loyalty, increase retention and foster greater creativity at work.


Green or Jaded?

Monday, August 20, 2007

The comment box was too small for my opinion on this.

Q: Do I support Play Green?
A: I'm in the moderate zone and could be swayed either way quite frankly.

I am not crunchy. I enjoy meat and actually boycott veggies. I love my Jeep. HOWEVER, I am a support junkie. I am your loyal on- board person. I believe in those who believe. So seeing Patty (and others) so passionate about any ONE thing is awesome. We get so caught up on initiatives, we forget to finish what we start(we as in Play yes, but also the world) So, if this is something we as a whole can move forward on, I might trade in my plastic bags for some canvas ones. BUT we've got to be smart. To what extent are we green? Green enough to pay more for supplies? Green enough to monetarily reward those who practice the zen of greenness? Green enough to be hard on those who are not, internally and externally? Green enough to not take clients on because they are not as green as we are?

I need some fodder here. I am not green in my own right. Never even thought about it til I started here. But, I do see the value in it. It's like our internal discussion today about caring. I care about the environment, but I do not feel a call to action. Nope, too many others on my call list.

So how can we take people from care/interest to action/acceptance?

1) Make it easier, not harder. Taking away something (bottled water) without providing an easy substitute makes unwelcomed response. Maybe giving a choice is better. Set a pitcher of water and some citrus (woo Kelly) next to the bottles for a few months. Start a collection bin at your desk for used supplies and volunteer to donate them on behalf of Play to save teammates the time and energy. See what happens naturally. Then people are intrinsically motivated to do the "right" or "green" thing but not forced to. Positive vibes aboutnd.

2) Don't impose, inspire. People don't take respect,they earn it. I admire many people in this office. Do some green things and reep the warm fuzzies and maybe I'll adopt the same practice because I'm inspired.

3) Support others' inititatives. If you want to get people on baord, you've got to go the extra mile on what they believe in. Create a supportive environment. That's the cause part of Play right? Do we know the #1 cause of each person on this team? If everyone put a think card on their desk tomorrow with what they care about - St. Jude, Sustainability, the SPCA, their mom, Former Rockers at VCU unite, would we be surprised at who said what? What are we doing to nuture ALL of those causes and not just most vocal? Does the squeaky wheel get the grease on the cause front?


Okay, enough with my never ending rhetorical questions. That's just how I express it. I will support Play Green if:

it is for the right reasons (the majority of us prioritize that, not just 3 people in a given week)
we are given options for the level of green we want to be. Making the options easy and your own individual choice.
and lastly, if it will inspire others who believe in that cause to want to come to work even a hair more than they did the day before. For this reason and this reason alone, I will try my best to believe in you and what you believe in.


whew. go dukes. Comments welcome. Love to Patty.

Play Goes Green, Act One

Friday, August 17, 2007












Based upon an emerging internal interest in how Play can leverage “sustainability” (i.e. environmental stewardship, community give-back, corporate social responsibility, etc.), I have been quite the feisty advocate of authenticity around the office these days. With “green” as a passion, I want to challenge and encourage us to think about how we as a collective walk the walk before (ideally)/as (likely) we continue to work more and more with our clients on the topic.

After a heated discussion with me at the party last night, this morning, Andy announced that Play would no longer be buying bottled water. Looking for an immediate area of improvement, it’s a small step towards us being just a bit better. If you’re not sure why it matters, here’s two unique links to educate us on the matter:

http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/117/features-message-in-a-bottle.html

An article that provides the “equal signs” for the energy that is used in producing and transporting startling numbers of bottled water. A lengthy article, but you can get the most crucial information in the first couple of pages. This is a good place to “get smart” on the topic quickly; it also has good business value case stories.

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/waterwatch/?fs=plasma.nationalgeographic.com

This one is a little more fun/visual. Learn about the world water crisis that is happening already – think it doesn’t matter in the US? Check out the map. Also, think that bottled water is cleaner than tap water? Check out the FDA article on why it’s a “6 in one, half a dozen in the other” outcome: bottled water versus tap.

If we can look at this as the first step to 1. initiating some “sustainable” changes in-house and 2. stimulating good fodder to use in sustainability conversations with clients, then I’ll stop making such a fuss about the whole thing and we’ll be better for it overall. To be continued . . .Thanks team.

From the Fringe

Monday, August 06, 2007










In terms of engagement: what does it really take to get people's attention in today's world?

When is it properly solicited? Can people be too engaged?
What is the balance of engagement and commitment/loyalty? Does one feed the other?

Think about that with this article from the DW:
Normally it's the drunk and unruly passengers who end up getting kicked to the curb, but, after getting an eye-full, an easily distracted driver in Germany shouted at a woman for wearing a low-cut blouse on his bus.

link

Sustainability - New and Different Thinking

Friday, August 03, 2007

If you're like most business leaders, you're seeing and hearing more and more about sustainability, carbon-responsibility, clean-tech, and, of course, "green" - and that this collection of issues will be one of the primary forces transforming business for the next 20+ years.

Perhaps you are business leader who has already and/or is currently taking tangible action in this arena. The ranks appear to be growing - in small and large companies alike across industries, including among others, WalMart, GE, Tyson, and BP. In addition, venture capital and private equity devoted to this "emerging" market, especially in "clean-tech", have increased dramatically.

And yet, the current reality seems to be that most business leaders are at the point of:

"I know this is upon us, I know it's big and only going to be bigger, I know I need to be taking action, but where do I start and how do I take action with my team in a meaningful, effective, profit- and growth-oriented way?" and

"I know we are doing a few things on this, but the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing - it's not deliberate, defined, purposeful - and I see that, at the least, being counterproductive - and more than likely, resulting in us being left behind."

Taking action in a meaningful way - a sustainable way, if you will - will require new and different thinking - pushed thinking - a new mindset. Notwithstanding the technical issues involved, perhaps most important to the long-term success will be answers to these questions: Do we have a coherent vision and strategy for how our organization will address this set of issues? How do I align my leadership and employees around this vision? How do we communicate a cohehsive and coherent set of messages internally? How do we align and develop the culture to support our vision? Are our external and internal actions and messages consistent? How do I ensure that the infrastructure is in place for the new ideas and different thinking required to address this new business reality?

How are you answering these questions? Are you prepared to tackle them? Are you ready for the new and different thinking that these questions require?

Archetypes and Blasphemies

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Do you subscribe to “The Writer Almanac with Garrison Keillor”? The daily subscription email that appears in my inbox from American Public Media is one of my most reliable sources of inspiration because it gives me a LAMSTAIH lens for the day and beyond. Whichever objective or client project is foremost in my mind somehow is easy to dissect or organize because of the literary jumpstart I get in the morning.

For instance, today The Writer Almanac followed its usual format: a poem and then a string of literary events that are associated with this date in history—an author’s birthday or death, the first publication of an American classic, etc. Today is the birthday of both Carl Jung and George Bernard Shaw. Here are the LAMSTAIH lenses I applied today thanks to one minute investment in an email.

Carl Jung, a psychologist and contemporary of Sigmund Freud, looked to children’s stories and fairy tales as a common source for human behavior. He coined the quintessential characters in these stories as archetypes. This word unlocked for me a way to express what we do when it comes to our work at Play, particularly around creativity and consumer insights. We know the collaborative creative process so well, that what we actually do in creativity training (through mindset and LEAF) is illuminate the creative archetypes, and help clients align with them. It creates freedom and reduces frustration to understand if you are (in Play-speak) a “Courtney or Andy” or a “Patty or Tim.” As we head into a discussion this afternoon with a local company to learn about an opportunity for applying our consumer insights capability, the word “archetype” is just the mental fodder I need to help frame all the work we have done, or to be bolder in describing how we might do it for them. Isn’t that what consumer insights is about? Organizing a demographic or target audience into discernable types for which you can more accurately determine their potential to buy or be attracted to your business?

The word “archetype” is not in itself the idea, but the inspiration. It doesn’t necessarily change any of the content in my head, but it gives me a sense of energy and purpose with which to freshly describe it, and re-believe it genuinely. Considering that word in the context of a subject that was already in my head gives me the feeling of being one step higher—having a little more perspective and a little closer to where I am headed.

Like Jung, playwright and wit, George Bernard Shaw was also born on the date. Shaw is giving me a linguistic lens, a nugget of inspiration, in his saying, “All great truths begin as blasphemies." What a great tool to use in a coaching session! Like “worst idea,” soliciting blasphemies could be extremely liberating and efficient in revealing the transformational end of the business spectrum when are reinventing a brand, product or culture. And I have always found that citing the inspiration with the creative activity helps lend credibility and engage collaboration with group of strangers who are following you blindly down a path.

Robert Throckmorton

Flying Buttress.